Page 1 of 1

FA or not...

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:16 am
by spaceace
i need to work on updating my styles to phpBB 3.2.x

i need to know if my users would like to maintain the current look of the icons in my styles or if you would like me to put in the Font Awesome(FA) icons that are stock in prosilver of phpBB 3.2

and example of the difference can be found on 2 of my test boards...

standard 3.1 image icons... look at the icon next to the FAQ link in the header
https://31.livemembersonly.com/

now for a Font Awesome style in 3.2... look at the same FAQ link
http://32.livemembersonly.com/

keep in mind that if they are added to my styles, they will not be the same colour as in those 2 links as they will fit the colour scheme of my styles ;)

Re: FA or not...

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 4:00 am
by Sniper_E
Alot of people love font awsome and it is built in 3.2...

Soooooo, I would go your colors of awsome in your 3.2 styles when updating.
I should get my old problue style updated to 3.2

Re: FA or not...

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 8:17 am
by spaceace
Sniper_E wrote:I should get my old problue style updated to 3.2
yes :D

Re: FA or not...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:41 am
by Sniper_E
And second thoughts, you could have your own icons and images for your custom style. There is nothing saying you have to use FA icons. I know all the work you had to put in to get all of those images setup. It would be harder to switch over to FA from what you have now.

Re: FA or not...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 4:05 pm
by spaceace
Sniper_E wrote:And second thoughts, you could have your own icons and images for your custom style. There is nothing saying you have to use FA icons. I know all the work you had to put in to get all of those images setup. It would be harder to switch over to FA from what you have now.
actually, i already have a Deepspace done for phpBB 3.2 that uses FA. just have to get everything updated to the full release of 3.2 :roll: